Setting aside the license writer / director Nate Parker has taken in his
retelling of the slave rebellion led by Nat Turner, the film distresses
because it borrows so freely and unnecessarily from the slave film
canon. The freshest element is Parker’s portrayal of Turner but even his
performance, which is quite good BTW, has remnant patches of Roots,
Glory and even 12 Years a Slave. The film is as bleak and bloody as the
event it recounts but without the resonance of many of its predecessors
and so I left feeling awful but not enlightened.
Alternative monitoring of popular culture ~ broadly defined ~ in the pursuit of deeper understanding
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Crime 101
Bart Layton's Crime 101 invites the audience into a world of corruption that is not so different from the real world, where even decent ...
-
As you closely read the two photographs above -- Sally Mann's "Candy Cigarette"(top) and Diane Arbus's ...
-
The release of a new Paul Thomas Anderson (PTA) feature film is an event for cinephiles because the decidedly quirky and celebrated auteur...
-
In traditional Hollywood terms, director Joseph Kosinki's $200 million racing baby, F1: The Movie , is a sure winner. With the epic ci...

No comments:
Post a Comment