Alternative monitoring of popular culture ~ broadly defined ~ in the pursuit of deeper understanding
Tuesday, March 24, 2026
Masking Make-over?
Backshop Memories
Billy Sunday Schooling
Monday, March 23, 2026
Lee Atwater's MAGA Nation
We don't need the Epstein Files to tell us the executive is an abuser.
He gives us evidence every day that he is a chronic belittler and batterer.
He attacks and demoralizes, feigns good humor while he patronizes others, smashes personal and professional boundaries, and struts about like a preening rooster in a barnyard.
He demands flattery, prefers women as silent ornaments and accessories, but is clearly intimidated by other men, deferring to them at first but undermining and undercutting them whenever the urge strikes just to show who's the boss.
He imagines inflicting pain on others -- remember the "shove protesters roughly in patrol cars" line from his rallies? -- and ICE is a dream come true for someone who peppers his speech with references to pain.
Like other abusers, he's afraid of losing control of his victim, so he's concocting narratives that leave him blameless and shifts all of the problems to his victims.
His ego is so fragile that he can't imagine his victim taking up with someone else, so he trashes all others as weak and unsuitable and makes that classic abuser threat, "If I can't have you, nobody can." He will leave the victim a dispirited, battered, pitiful wreck. Traumatized and twitchy.
The executive is a nation abuser
Nation abuse
We don't need the Epstein Files to tell us the executive is an abuser.
He gives us evidence every day that he is a chronic belittler and batterer.
He attacks and demoralizes, feigns good humor while he patronizes others, smashes personal and professional boundaries, and struts about like a preening rooster in a barnyard.
He demands flattery, prefers women as silent ornaments and accessories, but is clearly intimidated by other men, deferring to them at first but undermining and undercutting them whenever the urge strikes just to show who's the boss.
He imagines inflicting pain on others -- remember the "shove protesters roughly in patrol cars" line from his rallies? -- and ICE is a dream come true for someone who peppers his speech with references to pain.
Like other abusers, he's afraid of losing control of his victim, so he's concocting narratives that leave him blameless and shifts all of the problems to his victims.
His ego is so fragile that he can't imagine his victim taking up with someone else, so he trashes all others as weak and unsuitable and makes that classic abuser threat, "If I can't have you, nobody can." He will leave the victim a dispirited, battered, pitiful wreck. Traumatized and twitchy.
The executive is a nation abuser
The High Table
In John Wick: Chapter 2, Gianna D'Antonio (Claudia Gerini), the recently elevated head of the Italian mob who succeeded her deceased father into that seat, is hosting an enormous celebration in Rome.
All manner of potentates are present, even Vatican representatives. At one point, she meets with an African crime leader named Akoni (Chuk Iwuji), who challenges her taking of property that belonged to his people.
D'Antonio sluffs off the man's objection, saying the property was given willingly.
"With a knife at their throats," he says.
She corrects him. The knife was for their children.
"They were only meant to watch."
She icily ends the meeting and invites Akoni to rejoin the party.
A few minutes after this exchange, D'Antonio, who has been marked for execution by her envious brother (Riccardo Scamaracio), ends her life cutting her wrists before John Wick (Keanu Reeves) can put a bullet in her head.
Wick asks her why she was committing suicide, and she said she'd always lived on her own terms and would die on her own terms.
Throughout the five chapters of the Wick series, the taking of life is referred to as part of the business operated by the international criminal cartel called the High Table, which has its own laws and currency. All of those working for the High Table -- who pledge to serve and be of service -- are assets -- at once well-compensated and dispensable.
While it is foolish to search for real-world applications in every movie narrative, it is tough not to see the coldness of this country's present political enterprises through a "Wickian" lens, especially the targeting of the most vulnerable to provoke fear, intimidate, force compliance, silence resistance.
I think those reels of thousands and thousands of air travelers waiting hour after hour to board planes have the effect of intimidating non-travelers -- those of us who might feel powerless to force warring parties to agree.
I think we are simply meant to watch.
The Typing Pool
Patrick Davis, South Carolina Poet Laureate
Project Hail Mary II
Friday, March 20, 2026
Project Hail Mary
One's enjoyment of the Phil Lord and Christopher Miller space thriller Project Hail Mary will depend on one's appetite for (1) existential threats to planetary survival told as an intergalactic road movie and for (2) everybody's favorite Ken doll, Ryan Gosling. I'm pretty much a sucker for both.
Gosling stars as a Dr. Ryland Grace, a molecular biologist teaching middle school, who is "recruited" by an enigmatic scientist, Eva Stratt (Sandra Hüller), to be part of a project team to find out the cause of a celestial anomaly, called the Petrova line, that is robbing the sun of its energy.
The audience meets Grace as he awakens from a years-long coma, deep in space and approaching an unfamiliar star. Grace's story is revealed in flashback, as his memory returns, and he puts together the nature of his mission and what he must do to deliver vital information to the Earth, light-years away.
As he nears his destination, Grace encounters a gigantic spaceship being piloted by an alien being with far superior knowledge and capabilities, despite looking like a stone crab. Using human inqenuity, they learn to communicate. Grace names the alien Rocky, for obvious reasons, and they begin to pool their knowledge to chart a course to gather data and, as Rocky (voiced by James Ortiz) says, "save the stars."
Much of Project Hail Mary, which is based on the novel by Andy Weir, is about the mystery of the matter called "astrophage," star eater. The rest is about how having a common purpose binds spirits together, levels differences and puts a face on a universal concept called "love."
Sunday, March 15, 2026
Pillion
Writer/director Harry Lighton's Pillion is a steamy BDSM tale of a handsome, taciturn biker named Ray (Alexander Skarsgård) and a retiring but lonely parking patrol officer named Colin (Harry Melling) that manages to do much more than titillate and unnerve.
Those open to the rigid-then-shifting dynamic between these young men -- one a chilly monolith and the other a wounded ego -- might discover universal truths about the intertwining of identity and need.
That is, Lighton is proposing that we often become what we must to get what we want -- once we discover what that is.
Pillion, which is the name for the passenger seat on a motorbike, introduces us to Ray's tribe of dominants and their submissives in the South England town of Bromley without judgment or the gaze of the non-BDSM community. He makes clear these men are willing participants in humiliation, and, in fact, they are expressing a variety of love, even though Ray insists "this is not what this is about."
We also get to know Colin's loving and hugely supportive parents, mother Peggy (Lesley Sharp) and father Pete (Douglas Hodge), who are thrilled their younger son has found someone. But they quickly grow concerned about Ray's seeming lack of openness. Peggy, who is terminally ill, is worried that her son is being mistreated by someone he barely knows and whom she doesn't know at all. At a get-acquainted dinner, a surprising concession from the congenitally withholding Ray, Peggy confronts her son's friend, who responds by telling her to mind her business.
Fissures eventually develop in the relationship, leading to an ultimatum that both Ray and Colin regret.
No, Pillion's storyline, graphic nudity, and explicit depictions of sexual intercourse make it decidedly NOT for general audiences. However, looking beyond the leather and chains, one might find a relatable story about the lengths to which people will go to find "love" or something that approximates it.
Saturday, March 14, 2026
Sirât
I was not prepared for Oliver Laxe's intensely absorbing and devastating film Sirât, which has been nominated for an Oscar for Best International Feature.
Set in the desert regions of Morocco, Algeria and Mauritania, Sirât tells the story of a Spanish father, Luis, and his young son, Esteban, (Sergi López and Bruno Núñez Arjona, respectively) who are looking for their daughter/ sister. They believe she is attending a rave in a barren expanse of sand and rock in Morocco.
As father and son wander about the camp, asking ravers if they've seen the girl in a flier they are handing out, propulsive dance music throbs, bodies sway and twitch, and the audience is introduced to a "family" of roving ravers -- Steff, Josh, Jade, Begui and Tonin -- real-life street performers, artists and roustabouts playing themselves.
The ravers tell Luis and Esteban of another rave happening deep in the desert, quite a distance from there. Father and son ask to come along, as daughter/sister might be there. The ravers are reluctant, thinking of the treacherous road that lie ahead. But when the camp is dispersed by soldiers as part of a military evacuation, the ravers flee in the buses, followed by father and son in their minivan.
Unease creeps into the picture in the early minutes, mainly because we're not sure why the daughter is missing. We're not sure if Luis is uncertain or ashamed. This makes the subsequent perils even more unsettling and confounding. When sudden and horrific events happen, audiences might find themselves falling into despair, unable to see anything but dust and emptiness.
Sirât is beautifully filmed and the music rattling and thumping techno has been nominated for an Academy Award for sound. The picture contains many messages -- love and family, life's purpose, music as transformer and anesthetic.
But, to me, it is mostly about the value we assign to others and what those values say about us.
Friday, March 13, 2026
Private in Public
While waiting for my car to be serviced this morning, I was among a captive audience of seven or eight people within earshot of a conversation between two women who, it appeared, were strangers to one another.
A sympathetic comment after a big yawn was the opening salvo for a flood of stories about troubled sleep ("I didn't want to get out of bed this morning!"), family drama ("I don't understand what they're doing!"), darling grandchildren ("They're my heart!") and the grands' seemingly clueless parents ("He did wrong, but he's my son, so I have to back him up!").
I had taken a book to read but struggled to stay focused as the ladies shared all manner of family business -- pending divorces, children being used as weapons, the sanctity of widowhood, God's providence, etc.
One lady recounted how her daughter-in-law put news of her failing marriage on Facebook and complained when the husband's cousins weighed in. ("She had no business putting it out there!")
The service department was overrun this morning, so the ladies had lots of time to share and commiserate.
The sociologist in me wondered why it was so easy for them to "pour the tea" as they did.
Was it the anonymity of the customer lounge, where people also gab loudly on their phones?
Did these ladies enjoy the attention from the rest of us that their conversation pulled?
What would their families say if they knew Grandma was telling strangers about them?
This being "private in public" is nothing new, but it feels different, like folks need even MORE validation and connection than they did in the past.
Which, if true, is surprising, considering how pervasive social media "connections" are today.
But, on the other hand, maybe social media "connections" aren't authentic and leave folks wanting more -- like being six feet away.
TP USA
I see some states are trying to force Turning Point USA into colleges with the expressed intention of bolstering student character.
I suspect this move is to promote that group's agenda and groom students for the regime's nationalist enterprise.
Frankly, I'm conflicted about this. Not on the leveraging of a state to push TP USA on campuses; that's a non-starter for me.
I'm torn between letting TP USA give it a go and die on the vine as we'd hope and actively protesting the group's move. The First and Fourteenth amendments loom over barring the club entirely.
And yet I can imagine TP being used as a screening tool for future employment, kind of like Greek Letter Organizations have been networks into the middle-class for college grads. Some fraternities are sustained by prosperous and well-positioned alums who identify "worthy" junior members for employment in their companies and firms.
It's not a stretch for me to imagine TP USA using campus chapters in this way, handing out jobs in the public and private sectors to junior members who talk the talk and walk the walk.
Of course, equal employment legislation helped cut through closed networking systems, offering those who had been excluded access to those posts.
The executive likes a closed, controlled system, which is why DEI was attacked and dismantled.
International Showtime
TV babies of a certain age might remember International Showtime, which ran on NBC in the early-to-mid '60s.
Don Ameche, an actor about whom I knew nothing at the time, would introduce the various acts from locations around the world, mostly Europe. I especially enjoyed the circuses, and the white-faced Pierrot clowns in their pointed hats.
I think the sketches were in French or Italian, but they were wonderful, and unlike Northeast D.C. where I was living.
Watching International Showtime was transporting, kind of magical. The vast world was brought into the living room, through our sometimes snowy TV set -- Marshall McLuhan's legendary "global village."
Looking back I see that from 7:30 to 8:30 on Fridays, the world -- which was roiling with war and social injustice -- was, well, good.
How Soon is Now?
Friend Chuck Twardy introduced me to British post-punk band The Smiths back in the Reagan era and my ardor never waned over all these years, even after the group dissolved.
The band's songwriters -- guitarist Johnny Marr and singer Morrissey (birth name Steven Patrick Morrissey) -- are credited with pushing the boundaries of rock music with their rich melodic lines and lyrics about longing and isolation that are by turns plaintive and humorous. The band's following was serious and sizable.
Both Marr and Morrissey continue to record, with Marr's output surpassing Morrissey's in both style and substance -- and in quantity.
Still, as The Smiths, Marr and Morrissey wrote enduring songs in the indie rock vein. Among their more impactful is the lamentation "How Soon is Now?" It certainly is my favorite of their catalogue.
I recall being in Seattle with a friend, ready to ring in the new millennium. We wanted to be present in a tech capital if computer intelligence went kablooey.
While waiting in a night club to ring out 1999, I heard the needle drop on How Soon is Now? What an inspired choice, I thought, as I watched patrons flood onto the dance floor.
The song is about our universal need for human connection -- a valuable reminder then as we were worried that our cyber intelligence would evaporate.
But it's also valuable for us today -- maybe more so -- as we stare down Artificial Intelligence, waiting to see who blinks first.
(Click photo for song)
Tuesday, March 10, 2026
Dairy Queen ad and Media Literacy
Back when I was in the classroom, I laid a foundation for the formal study of media messages by including this Dairy Queen ad from 1960, a period of sufficient distance that its products can be looked at dispassionately while maintaining social, political and historical significance.
I talk about why the ad was created (to maintain / increase share of the fairly new but lucrative fast-food market) and where it appeared (print publications), noting in most instances that there was accompanying text ("ad copy") to make the pitch to consumers.
I talk about the bright colors tying the elements together and the kinds of feelings psychologists tell us yellows, blues, greens and reds prompt in most of us.
I talk about the "story" or "narrative" in this ad -- a gathering of a dozen or so folks on a sunny day, probably a weekend, outside of the city, to get ice cream, as that is mainly what DQ was known for at the time, denoted by the soft-serve cone in the sign.
I also point out -- though many students are well ahead of me on this point -- that all of the human subjects in the ad appear to be white, dressed in what would have been conventional middle-class, color-coordinated apparel -- collared shirts and skirts -- and driving vehicles because that's how you got to DQ in the burgeoning suburbs in the Eisenhower years. They are neat, well-groomed, with bright smiles that suggest they are in good health.
I talk about how the choices of color, subjects and location were deliberate and intended to connect with a target audience, whom advertisers hoped would see themselves either actually or ideally in that space, in that story.
I talk about how media messages became more diversified to reflect greater social and economic equality, but the "stories" and "spaces" remained essentially separate with ads targeting blacks set in cities ("urban markets") and ads directed at whites set in locales outside of the city.
I point out that today, or until quite recently, media messages that were NOT inclusive were not reflective of real-world spaces and stories that have been created in the 70s years since the DQ ad. I tell the students that inclusion and diversification of media messages has not only been sound and realistic but they've been profitable for these multi-billion dollar businesses.
I still believe all of this, but I've been wondering lately if this message would be stifled in academies of higher education in 2026?
Laura Nyro's World
Monday, March 9, 2026
The Crucible at Trustus Theatre
Trustus Theatre has successfully staged Arthur Miller's classic Red Scare-era play The Crucible in a modified form as a merging of the original focus on the Salem Witch Trials of the 17th century with contemporary musings on moral panic and injustice, deceit and betrayal.
Director Jayce Tromsness, a veteran Trustus performer and company member, has moved this familiar work into a modernist arena that offers outlines of performance space backed by semi-opaque screens. Characters wear a mix of black and grey period and contemporary costumes, many bearing splashes of brilliant red symbolizing the bloody work being done.
Absent Miller's original lengthy disquisitions, the play offers the story of a community near Salem, Massachusetts, that is caught up in the puritanical purging of suspected witches. A group of young girls, following the lead of a Barbadian slave named Tituba (Nicole Perez), were seen dancing in a field by the resident minister, Rev. Parris (William Paul Brown). As the girls succumb to various mysterious ailments, including catatonia, Parris summons another minister, Rev. Hale (Asaru Buffalo) to lend assistance.
Thus begins an investigation that eventually consumes the community and leads to the arrest of many woman who were accused by the girls of being witches, following the lead of a manipulative fraud named Abigail (Kaeleigh Miller).
When Elizabeth Proctor (Ashley Rose Montondo), the wife of one of the town's most upstanding members, John Proctor (Jason Stokes), is arrested, Proctor's affair with young Abigail is revealed to the audience as is her motive for naming his wife.
The Deputy Governor (Steve Harley) arrives to judge the guilt and innocence of those accused, more panic sets in, homes and farms are emptied by wave upon wave of accusation. Defenses are seen as threats to law and order, and the court is revealed to be an elaborate double-bind where justice cannot be secured for those charged if they don't admit to being guilty.
Miller, who was a truly literary playwright, explored multiple levels of personal and societal truth, his thoughts about faith and duty are profound, and the final scene of John Proctor's "confession" is a pinnacle moment in a work that at its center extols integrity and heroism.
The Crucible is a big work, searing and upsetting in the boldness of its rage, and Trustus' production spares no one, even today's leaders who themselves stoke fear and paranoia to maintain their grip on power.
Saturday, March 7, 2026
Hoppers
Daniel Chong's animated feature Hoppers is the most fun I've had at the movies in quite a while.
It's the tale of a spirited young environmental crusader named Mabel (voiced by Piper Curda) who takes on an ambitious public official (Jon Hamm) to save a beloved beaver pond from highway development.
Mabel uses an outlandish mind-transferral device -- that is decidedly NOT like Avatar -- created by a university researcher to infiltrate the natural world and recruit animals to return to the spot and thwart the development plan.
Mabel moves into a convincing robotic beaver suit created by the professor, Dr. Sam (Kathy Najimi), and heads out on her crusade.
The array of critter characters she encounters in the wild is endlessly delightful, none more so than George, the crowd-pleasing partymaster and king of the mammals (Bobby Moynihan). And the film's serious message about peaceful coexistence is needed in these dismal times.
As with most recent Disney / Pixar productions, Hoppers has something for all ages, but I believe it will resonate best with oldsters who not only get the sight gags, but who recognize what is truly at stake for our present and future survival -- working together.
Elmer Gantry (1960)
A friend's note this morning about a Texas mega-preacher who promoted the war with Iran as a holy testament to the Second Coming got me thinking about Richard Brooks' Elmer Gantry (1960).
Brooks may have inserted this opening crawl in the film to appease the film review panel or perhaps his own conscience. Dunno.
The note about the impact on children seems quaint, doesn't it?
"We believe that certain aspects of Revivalism can bear examination—that the conduct of some revivalists makes a mockery of the traditional beliefs and practices of organized Christianity!
"We believe that everyone has a right to worship according to his conscience, but Freedom of Religion is not a license to abuse the faith of the people!
"However, due to the highly controversial nature of this film, we strongly urge you to prevent impressionable children from seeing it!"
I LOVE the posters.
Becket (1964) redux
I don't think of Peter Glenville's Becket (1964) as a particularly "religious" film, even though its title character is Roman Catholic prelate and martyr Thomas Becket.
It is, however, a very political movie, which might amount to the same thing these days.
The film, whose screenplay received an Academy Award, recounts the power dynamic between England's Henry II (Peter O'Toole) and his former chancellor, Archbishop of Canterbury Thomas Becket, played by Richard Burton. The king and Becket were once carousing friends.
In the movie, Becket takes on a different posture after agreeing to become the king's man in the church and help him control powerful bishops. Becket is ordained and elevated, rapidly.
Becket's crisis of conscience over the king's desire to control church leaders leads to a rift between the old friends. At one point before his miserable end, Becket is approached by armed men who threaten to arrest him.
Watching from a window, Henry sees Becket warn soldiers that if they lay a hand on him their souls will be damned. The men retreat. Henry smiles and says to himself, "Well-played, Thomas."
The impasse is brief, the battle of wills continues and Henry eventually exclaims, "Will no one rid me of this meddlesome priest?" It is taken to heart by his guards, who descend upon Becket while he's at mass. Becket's dying words: "Poor Henry."
It is unclear if Becket is speaking spiritually, bemoaning the king's damnation, or is referring to the inevitable war with Holy Mother Church. Henry eventually does public penance for his rashness.
In either case, the picture IS crystal clear that power often rests with those who can make the most compelling argument about the nature of God's will and commands. That might be why the film's script was so celebrated.
We are seeing similar tactics today, in bloody, brutal dispatches and pronouncements about the war in the Middle East. Its defenders are invoking the Almighty. Even as the head of the Roman Catholic Church condemns it repeatedly.
Masking Make-over?
Maybe ICE agents just need a masking make-over. A little splash of color? No? Lipstick on a pig, you say?
-
As you closely read the two photographs above -- Sally Mann's "Candy Cigarette"(top) and Diane Arbus's ...
-
The release of a new Paul Thomas Anderson (PTA) feature film is an event for cinephiles because the decidedly quirky and celebrated auteur...
-
In Jean-Jacques Annaud's 1986 thriller The Name of the Rose, Sean Connery stars as a spirited and independent medieval Francisc...





.jpg)







.jpg)












